video thumbnail 5:44
Killing Maths Mosquitoes with Atomic Proofs: roots of two, Fermat and prime numbers

2015-10-23

[public] 123K views, 3.06K likes, 20.0 dislikes audio only

How to prove that the roots of two are irrational using Fermat's Last Theory and that there are infinitely many primes using the Green-Tao theorem.

Yes, yes: Green and Tao took it as a given that there are infinitely many prime numbers and my pithy proof may very well be circular! If you wish to check, they're paper is here: http://annals.math.princeton.edu/wp-content/uploads/annals-v167-n2-p03.pdf

Actually, the point has been raised that even the Andrew Wiles proof of Fermat must contain the assumption that 2 is irrational, or something equivalent. If anyone can email me an Atomic Mosquito proof ( matt@standupmaths.com ) which does not contain any circular logic, I'll do a follow-up video.

This is PrimeGrid: http://www.primegrid.com/

If you missed them, here are the 26 primes which are all 5,283,234,035,979,900 apart:

43142746595714191

48425980631694091

53709214667673991

58992448703653891

64275682739633791

69558916775613691

74842150811593591

80125384847573491

85408618883553391

90691852919533291

95975086955513191

101258320991493091

106541555027472991

111824789063452891

117108023099432791

122391257135412691

127674491171392591

132957725207372491

138240959243352391

143524193279332291

148807427315312191

154090661351292091

159373895387271991

164657129423251891

169940363459231791

175223597495211691


1994 Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem
/youtube/video/W1OkVkq2vFM?t=64.029999
Proof by Contradiction
/youtube/video/W1OkVkq2vFM?t=112.45