2015-10-23
[public] 123K views, 3.06K likes, 20.0 dislikes audio only
How to prove that the roots of two are irrational using Fermat's Last Theory and that there are infinitely many primes using the Green-Tao theorem.
Yes, yes: Green and Tao took it as a given that there are infinitely many prime numbers and my pithy proof may very well be circular! If you wish to check, they're paper is here: http://annals.math.princeton.edu/wp-content/uploads/annals-v167-n2-p03.pdf
Actually, the point has been raised that even the Andrew Wiles proof of Fermat must contain the assumption that 2 is irrational, or something equivalent. If anyone can email me an Atomic Mosquito proof ( matt@standupmaths.com ) which does not contain any circular logic, I'll do a follow-up video.
This is PrimeGrid: http://www.primegrid.com/
If you missed them, here are the 26 primes which are all 5,283,234,035,979,900 apart:
43142746595714191
48425980631694091
53709214667673991
58992448703653891
64275682739633791
69558916775613691
74842150811593591
80125384847573491
85408618883553391
90691852919533291
95975086955513191
101258320991493091
106541555027472991
111824789063452891
117108023099432791
122391257135412691
127674491171392591
132957725207372491
138240959243352391
143524193279332291
148807427315312191
154090661351292091
159373895387271991
164657129423251891
169940363459231791
175223597495211691